Original: http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_amazin_071217_an_argument_against_.htm

Argument against the current version of 'reality'


The binary code is simple, no? 1 or 0, on or off, yet look at what you can find on the internet. You can even see our locality of the Universe.

Well, similarly, the Universe itself is a simple place. In fact is it is even simpler, tending to absolute simplicity in that it is simply 'something' as opposed to 'nothing', as 'nothing' does not even exist. And the entire Universe is composed of just one single ingredient, and whether you want to call it 'space' or cheat and use the terminology of 'spacetime' and complicate it with mathematics is neither here or there. Just realise that space is not 'nothing'. If it were nothing, then there would be no dimension. So 'space' is a structure or medium of what-have-you.

There is just one lot of this stuff of space, concentration of discrete quantities of which give the effect of the sub-atomic particles, which combine in discrete quantities to form the effect of atoms, and so molecules and so matter, aggregating in clumps to form clouds of hydrogen etc. and so stars and their planets and - and us. But it is still only 'space' or, cheating, 'spacetime', as 'time' does not exist in reality apart from an effect of 'space' in the form of the chemical organisms we call 'life', with its ability to observe from varying points across space.

The groupings of molecules, planets, stars, galaxies etc. naturally give rise to the various naturally consequent forces of binding energy of the atoms, a weak repulsive force if atoms are disturbed, gravity and long-distance galactic- or space-repulsion. And all of it interacts so that in a single integrated vastly-convoluted action Universe gloriously . . . transpires! - Once. (But, just supposing you could run the process of Universe a trillion times, it would have to happen precisely the same, each and every time.) - But it is all very simple and reasonable.

Super. Could you have anything more sublimely simple than that?

It is perhaps also worth mentioning that you cannot add or subtract a single particle to or from the universe, and that the Universe is already complete, a done thing. Simply for living beings, as chemical organisms which function progressively as an integral part in the process of Universal completion, the Universe necessarily seems to be incomplete and to be in progressive action, without 'time' in its function except for us in our place and other living things in theirs as an integral part of its completion with our mental snapshots saying 'here and now . . . and 'here and now' . . . and 'here and now'. Simple? And yes, even an infinite Universe is already complete within the state of its entity.

Sure. So we can look back and see reality as it 'happened' 'yesterday' or 'last year' or 'a billion years ago'. But we cannot affect what happened yesterday, can we? It is safe from our interference, or should be.

We can even believe that we can change 'the future'. Well, our actions, in reality inevitable in human terms because of our genetic prescription and conditioned behaviour but requiring our seemingly voluntary 'decision', can affect 'the present'. Yes, that's what 'decision' and 'volition' are in the context of the already complete Universe.

In this Universe every particle is how it has to be and where it has to be at any particular position. And when it has to change, due to the natural instability of its physical composition or by being affected by external influences, it changes to what it then has to be. It has no other option. So, even with supernovae and galaxies in collision, it is a perfect Universe. What some call 'chaos' is really perfect Universal order. However, though Universe is already complete, it is not predictable by us, even in the immediate 'future'.

Look at yesterday and you will see how it is, or 'was' in that position. But 'possibility' and 'probability' do not exist in the real world any more than 'nothing' can exist in a physical Universe. What has to happen happens. That is reality. Mathematics, as a logically self-fulfilling prescription, effectively does nothing other than try to describe reality in another language, and if any aspect of the input or mathematical syntax is at fault - and it usually is - then the result will be erroneous. And in any case, it can only sip at 'possibilities' that in reality cannot exist until the reality of the situation eventuates and asserts itself.

So Universe is all very simple and honest and understandable.

Well, it was.

Unfortunately we now have a problem. Our senses may show us what reality is, but some of our kind, motivated by their principal ability of deliberate deception and with all the means of science, psychology and the media at their disposal, try to persuade us that what we are seeing is not the case, that things are not what we see and hear, but rather are what for their own reasons they want us to think we see and hear. Their main reason, by the way, is to prevent you seeing that they are robbing you of everything, including all chance of any future.

Pity, that.

Their declared motive is that they want most of us to become extinct in their favour, by fair means or foul, and it seems they prefer foul. Their religion is to deceive, and by their creed they deliberately mislead our children, impoverish our adults and provoke the destruction and degradation of all nations other than their own. They make themselves the enemies of everyone else in that they oppose everyone other than themselves, and given the chance they will even cheat each other.

The evidence of this malign interference is easy to see. Here we have a little planet which was still big enough for hundreds of millions of years of dinosaurs, and which can easily feed and sustain a hundred thousand million humans in happy plenty, but which is kept in a state of warring need by the activities of just these few exercising their ill-will toward the rest via a stupid fraud called finance. They and their activities are even overheating the planet. - How?

Seventy percent or more of work done is completely unnecessary, is done simply to 'get' the money made necessary to buy food and pay 'interest' in a world under the scourge of finance inflicted by these 'Few'. The extra energy used in this unnecessary work is overheating the planet. Almost all crime is also motivated by the 'need' for money, for drugs and the profligate modern 'lifestyle' encouraged by those who require consumerism as the mainspring of their false religion of 'the economy'.

It follows therefore that if we share out the necessary work, then we will work only three or four months per year. The extra energy, presently overheating the planet, will not be expended, and so the problem of planetary overheating will be resolved. This also explains why the international predators want to eliminate only two-thirds of our population: the other third will then work full-time as their slaves for their 'economic well-being'.

 

You know, we can easily do better than this. I know it and you should know it even though these evil few try to persuade you otherwise.

Then let us do this: If we have to have 'leaders', and we don't have to, then let us nominate and draft our own, rather than the foisted corrupt choice of these malicious few vermin infesting and disrupting the peaceful progress of all our countries.

How? Easy. We must draft our own representatives who, if we require nominated decisions, will speak for us. But first we will warn them: Vote on your conscience. We will replace you at a moment's notice if you are against the general good, and we will hang you if you are corrupt, together with your corruptors.

We then abolish the corrupt system of 'party-politics', then abolish the finance that for the last five thousand years has permitted this vicious system of corruption and manipulation that has so impeded all human progress and caused such devastation of the other species of the planet.

 

So there is the simple situation. In the interest of the planet we have the alternative: rid the planet of two-thirds of its population while continuing with the slavery of the rest, or rid it of the evils of finance. I know which I prefer. What about you?

So that's not hard, is it?

Right, folks, then let's just do that. Utopia - the best state imaginable - is at hand for the taking. This means a stable planet, enough for everyone, work just three months a year; finance, debt, taxes, war, criminality, greed and hardship all abolished, providing justice for all and the enjoyment of life. - Sure, folks, so let's just take that option!

But, really, can we do this? Yes, really. And when I say really, I mean REALLY!.

Home