TRUST
Do you really think we should any longer exercise trust?
Suppose I were to say to you, "Here is a loan guarantee for ten billion dollars. You can take it, and it will return half a billion dollars a year, which we can split sixty-forty, and we will hide your two hundred million a year for you and multiply it many times over, and you may be sure that you and your descendants will never have to pay a dime in taxes on it except - per-haps - for what you take out to spend. But I am employing you to do as I say, and that is to operate society to make money for me - yes, just as my nice friendly bankers do, socially respected and seamlessly integrated, as you see - and to have a few people suppressed or annulled now and again if necessary. Agreed?"
If you were to agree and do what is required of you by such a benefactor - and as any economic hit-man can tell you it would be as well for the state of your health that you did agree - you would only be doing what about 98% of 'our leaders' do. These then lead us in the ways that their masters, rather than we, intend, with their for-fun-and-profit wars, torture, central-banks and their lending of ink as 'debt' and consequent reaping of taxes, and the physical and mental impoverishment, social domestication and virtual slavery of most of our populations via the infliction of their cash on every aspect of our lives, its lending and - as we see, easily-produced - cyclical recession and depression.
The proceeds of all this manipulation and reaping of the results of all our efforts are hoarded in what are termed 'Trusts' or 'Foundations', which - by 'laws' that have been established to implement the wishes of those who pay 'good money' for them - are exempt from all taxes, which - by the establishment of 'laws' similar but in reverse effect - are what only our common herd have to pay, to make the whole concept work so fruitfully for those who established the idea five thousand years or so ago.
Just in case you do not know, Reader, if I were to say this to you, these days, and for the last two centuries, my name would be either Rothschild or that of a Rothschild agent. If indeed you did not know this, then it is nothing of which to be ashamed, as their discretion amounts to 'Classified - Top Secret', except for their purported good taste and much-bruited 'philanthropy'. Indeed, a beautiful professor of ecomonics, whose speciality is in fact 'the trusts' and who researched at Harvard, was once heard to ask in wondering innocence when the name 'Rothschild' was mentioned, "Aren't they some kind of bankers?"
In reality, of course, the 'money', by which all these effects are achieved and in which the worth of all things presently is measured, is a total fiction. Money has no real 'value' of any kind. A ten dollar axe is really just an axe, and any 'value' that it has resides solely in its effectiveness as an axe, nothing more. Similarly, a banknote has no real 'value' other than the use of any similar-sized and -shaped piece of paper, irrespective of what any inky writing on it may claim to 'say'. However, we are trained from infancy to recognise 'the value of money', but never the fact of the deliberate inexorable leaching of any such delusory value or any of the secret mechanisms by which such fictional value is transferred from us to them and their trusts.
So if I were speaking as a Rothschild I would not cheapen my offer to the intended lackeys by telling them that all these loan guarantees, as mere pieces of paper, cost me not a dime, nor the ink on my pretty paper banknotes, not a cent, nor that all the 'wealth' accumulated in my engorged 'trusts' likewise has no real value. After all, for humans to be impoverished, stupefied and eliminated would make it all seem a bit pointed and insultingly parsimonious if it were seen to have been done on the cheap all these millennia. I mean, can you imagine any sane non-vegetable species giving up an entire planet and shuffling obediently off into extinction just because a stunted ape has merely said? No, I should think not. So I might lose my effective credibility with - and such rewarding influence over - the credulous human cattle on which at present I exercise such power as master of all I survey - subterranean cities and all, for when any surviving remnants finally realise what I have been up to for the last two centuries and the proverbial hits the fan. - Yes, when we slip away I shall really have to give them something to keep them too busy just trying to survive to stop and come after us, and I and my boys at Dimona know just what . . .
So now we hear that Mubarak has accumulated 70 billion USD during his 'reign', which supposedly would make him the richest man in the world were we to ignore the contents of the 'trusts' of all those 'leaders' who have gone before, and those who control all these trusts. So, with them in mind, we should not be too surprised by the news of Mubarak's newfound riches, nor by the fact that the Rothschilds never appear high on the lists of the most-moneyed folk in the world, as their possession and control of the trusts is never mentioned - no, Studious Reader, no matter how courteously you may enquire about them.
There are only about four hundred trillion dollars-worth of various 'currencies' officially in circulation in the world. However, an estimate some ten years ago put the value of the contents of the trusts at between forty and sixty quadrillion USD, which 'figure' is constantly increased by 'investment' - the infliction of equally illusory debt, whether we like it or want it or not - on all our countries and on all our activities, which exercises the leaching process on all our production. Were it beyond us to institute a moneyless society, which is simple to do, and thus each work between two and six months per year to produce and distribute essentials to supply need, then instead of borrowing obligatorily repayable debt from the Rothschilds, who with their accomplices operate the predatory financial system, our world could still benefit enormously by each country printing whatever 'finance' be necessary to operate its infrastructure.
In this way we would avoid having to work ever more to try to repay the Rothschilds' entirely fictional 'debt', and would avoid their continual predation on us and on our world. But, with our current raft of leaders corrupted to the interests of others, a whole section of our society officially dedicated to implementing the financial mechanism in those alien interests, and the sleeker element of our bloated bureaucracies well-enough paid to ensure that nobody can rock the boat, do you think there is even the slightest chance of any such sanity? No, neither do I.
So, all this considered, are we thus to continue to trust our leaders, who over the millennia have so-aptly demonstrated their untrustworthiness to act in any interest other than that of their own pockets? Oh, as examples we can easily see those involved* in 9-11, for a pipeline to the Caspian Sea basin oil and gas, to destroy SEC evidence of fraud, Dov's trillions and Larry's billions**; and then the shameless and still unrepentant Blair and Aznar joining the despicable Bushes in their 'coalition of the willing' to force through a criminal war despite the massive protest of '94% of the population' in the case of Aznar - for the Iraqi oil, with central banks for both Afghanistan and Iraq, all in one fell swoop - and oh, we can easily draw our own conclusions about what was in it for whom.
Then are we to sit here passively, like obedient dogs with pieces of bacon laid on our noses while our controllers say, "Trust"? Or are we to extend the notable example of the brave Egyptian people and tear open these 'trusts', tear open the BIS, scrutinise and abolish all the central banks and their owners, tear open the Rothschilds' records and secret documents and, after five thousand years of servitude, finally take charge of our world in an equitable and incorruptible society without leaders? After all, whose world is this? Is it for just these few evil predatory manipulators and their corrupt lackeys, or for the vast honest population who only want to dwell in productive peace?
Are we, too, adult humans with responsibility for ourselves and our peoples, or are we obedient dogs and the victim 'cattle' that these rodent vermin say we are? - Well, ask yourself, Reader, which are you?
Then, Honest Reader, switch off that anodyne TV, get off your backside and prove it.
*http://www.bloomingtonalternative.com/node/10604
**http://www.911review.com/attack/wtc/b7.html